Video ‘links’ Homa Bay governor to voter bribery

Wednesday November 22 2017

Homa Bay Governor Cyprian Awiti (left) and his

Homa Bay Governor Cyprian Awiti (left) and his deputy Hamilton Orata at the Homa Bay High Court after the hearing of an election petition against him on October 31, 2017. PHOTO | BARACK ODUOR | NATION MEDIA GROUP 

More by this Author

Former Kasipul MP Oyugi Magwanga’s witness in the ongoing Homa Bay gubernatorial petition hearing on Wednesday produced video evidence before court allegedly connecting Governor Cyprian Awiti?to bribery of voters.

The witness told the court that the governor engaged in electoral misconduct by bribing voters before the August 8 General Election.

The witness, Mr Maddo Ochieng’, testified during cross-examination that some county government officials were seen giving money to voters at Kodula market, Rachuonyo North Sub-County, to influence their choice of governor candidates.?


“I witnessed and recorded Chief Officers and County Executive Committee Members giving out money to voters during campaigns,” said Mr Ochieng’, “They were driving around in county government vehicles.”

Mr Magwanga filed the petition to challenge the re-election of Mr Awiti and his deputy Hamilton Orata.

Mr Ochieng’ told the court that he had gathered enough proof that Mr Awiti was re-elected unfairly. The witness claimed that the governor demanded that he be declared the winner without following the proper procedure.

In the video clips presented before court, Mr Ochieng’ claimed that the governor demanded that the county returning officer, Mr Michael Kosgei, declare the election results before receiving all the polling materials.


“There were delays at the county tallying centre on the declaration of election results because the election forms were not submitted on time,” said Mr Ochieng’. “However, Governor Awiti demanded that the declaration should be made without all the electoral documents.”

Mr Awiti’s lawyer Steve Biko and the IEBC’s?Fredrick Orego, however, dismissed the claims, citing lack of trust in the videos and their origin.

Mr Biko argued that the video clips did not connect the governor with the offence that Mr Magwanga alleged in his case.

“The videos were captured on different dates and, therefore, cannot be used as evidence that they influenced the declaration of results being challenged,” said Mr Biko.

Mr Orego claimed that the video could be manipulated before being brought to court.

He argued that the witness could have recorded the videos before the campaigns and they should not be used as evidence to challenge the re-electionof Governor Awiti.

“The videos could have been recorded at a past event and not necessarily during the campaigns, meaning that they cannot be relied upon as evidence that voters were being bribed,” said Mr Orego.

                                    1. 8196101083 2018-01-23
                                    2. 2172121082 2018-01-23
                                    3. 6616301081 2018-01-23
                                    4. 9711621080 2018-01-23
                                    5. 4071601079 2018-01-23
                                    6. 8575311078 2018-01-22
                                    7. 6504161077 2018-01-22
                                    8. 6475951076 2018-01-22
                                    9. 1312951075 2018-01-22
                                    10. 2746621074 2018-01-22
                                    11. 151871073 2018-01-22
                                    12. 4637141072 2018-01-22
                                    13. 5414891071 2018-01-21
                                    14. 392961070 2018-01-21
                                    15. 9593791069 2018-01-21
                                    16. 9326521068 2018-01-21
                                    17. 8204451067 2018-01-21
                                    18. 3174701066 2018-01-21
                                    19. 1649671065 2018-01-21
                                    20. 5257251064 2018-01-21